Introduction To Style Of Writing

تقليص
X
 
  • تصفية - فلترة
  • الوقت
  • عرض
إلغاء تحديد الكل
مشاركات جديدة
  • محمد مصطفى
    عضو الملتقى
    • 29-06-2009
    • 40

    Introduction To Style Of Writing


    INTRODUCTION TO STYLE OF WRITING
    Writing style is the manner in which a writer addresses a matter in prose. A style reveals the writer's personality or 'voice.' It is the result of the choices the writer makes in syntactical structures, diction, and figures of thought. Similar questions of style exist in the choice of spoken language.
    Constraints on style
    Occupation
    Writing in certain occupations imposes style constraints. Scholarly writing usually avoids figures of speech and prefers precise descriptions to colloquial terms. News reporting requires smaller words, even if colloquial, and shorter sentences, to be easy to read by everyone in a general audience. Fiction writing, in contrast, is designed to entertain and arouse the reader, and is improved by the judicious use of figures of speech. A judge's verdict needs precision to explain the judge's reasoning, but often uses literary devices to persuade the reader of its correctness.
    A writer can combine personal style with the style expected in the occupation, but doing so to excess may distract from the purpose. A scientific paper with excessive personal style may make the reader question its seriousness; a news article with excessive personal style may make the reader doubt the author's neutrality. Fiction written in the customary style of a scientific paper would not keep the reader interested.
    Audience
    The writer needs to know who the reader is. This dictates the differences in occupational style noted above, but also constrains style within an occupation or setting. The author needs to answer the following questions regarding the audience:
    • How well does the reader read? Using excessively complex language when writing to children or to the general public will hinder communication, but using excessively simple language when writing to a trained audience will seem condescending.
    • What does the reader know? Spending words explaining things that the reader already knows will make the reader lose interest. However, communication is impossible if the writer assumes knowledge the reader does not have.
    [edit] Situation and purpose
    The author needs to tailor style to the situation. For example, the same person writing a letter to the same reader would use different style depending on whether it is a letter of complaint, a letter of condolence, or a business letter. The author needs to decide whether the goal of the writing is to inform, persuade, or sympathize.
    Stylistic choices
    Sentence forms
    A writer controls not only the density of prose but its distribution. Within the rules of grammar, the writer can arrange words in many ways. A sentence may state the main proposition first and then modify it; or it may contain language to prepare the reader before stating the main proposition.
    Varying the style may avoid monotony. However, in technical writing, using different styles to make two similar utterances makes the reader ask whether the use of different styles was intended to carry additional meaning.
    Stylistic choices may be influenced by the culture. In the modern age, for instance, the loose sentence has been favored in all modes of discourse. In classical times, the periodic sentence held equal or greater favor, and during the Age of Enlightenment, the balanced sentence was a favorite of writers.
    The loose sentence
    The most common sentence in modern usage, the loose sentence begins with the main point (an independent clause), followed by one or more subordinate clauses. For example:
    Uncle Tom's Cabin is a very influential novel, having its self-righteous, virtuous sentimentality, much in common with Little Women (James Baldwin).
    The cat sat on the mat, purring softly, having licked his paws
    According to Francis Christensen:
    The loose sentence ... characterized the anti-Ciceronian movement in the seventeenth century. This movement, according to Morris W. Croll [“The Baroque Style in Prose,” (1929)] began with Montaigne and Bacon and continued with such men as Donne, Browne, Taylor, Pascal. To Montaigne, its art was the art of being natural; to Pascal, its eloquence was the eloquence that mocks formal eloquence; to Bacon, it presented knowledge so that it could be examined, not so that it must be accepted. (in Winterowd, 'Contemporary Rhetoric: A Conceptual Background with Readings,' p.348)
    The periodic sentence
    In contrast, a periodic sentence places the main point in the middle or at the end of the sentence. In the former case, the main point is modified by subordinate clauses before and after its position in the sentence. In the latter case, the main point is modified by preceding subordinate clauses.
    Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison. (Henry David Thoreau)
    The purpose of such form is well-stated by Adams Sherman Hill in The Foundation of Rhetoric (1897):
    To secure force in a sentence, it is necessary not only to choose the strongest words and to be as concise as is consistent with clearness, but also to arrange words, phrases, and clauses in the order which gives a commanding position to what is most important, and thus fixes the attention on the central idea.
    The balanced sentence
    A balanced sentence is characterized by parallel structure: two or more parts of the sentence have the same form, emphasizing similarities or differences.
    Diction
    Depending on the mode in which the writer is writing, diction can also pertain to the writer's style. Argumentative and expository prose on a particular subject matter frequently makes use of a set of jargon in which the subject matter is commonly discussed. By contrast, narrative and descriptive prose is open to the vast variety of words. Insofar as a style of diction can be discerned, however, it is best to examine the diction against a number of spectrums:
    • Abstract-concrete: how much of the diction is physical?
    • General-specific: to what degree is the diction precise, to what degree is it vague?
    • Denotation-connotation
    • Literal-metaphorical
    Other attributes of diction include:
    • Density
    • Length
    Connotation
    The connotation of a word refers to the special associations, apart from its dictionary definition, that it may convey. Connotation especially depends on the audience. The word "dog" denotes any animal from the genus canis, but it may connote friendship to one reader and terror to another. This partly depends on the reader's personal dealings with dogs, but the author can provide context to guide the reader's interpretation.
    Deliberate use of connotation may involve selection of a word to convey more than its dictionary meaning, or substitution of another word that has a different shade of meaning. The many words for dogs have a spectrum of implications regarding the dog's training, obedience, or expected role, and may even make a statement about the social status of its owner ("lap dog" versus "cur"). Even synonyms have different connotations: slender, thin, skinny may each convey different images to the reader's mind. The writer should choose the connotation, positive, negative, or neutral, that supports the mood.
    Writing for the learned, connotation may involve etymology or make reference to classic works. In schoolbooks, awareness of connotation can avoid attracting extraneous ideas (as when writing "Napoleon was a bigger influence than Frederick the Great on world history" provokes thoughts of Napoleon's physical stature). In encyclopedias, words should connote authority and dispassion; the writer should avoid words whose connotations suggest bias, such as pejorative words.

  • محمد مصطفى
    عضو الملتقى
    • 29-06-2009
    • 40

    #2

    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
    السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
    أتوجه بالشكر للأستاذ الدكتور / أحمد الليثي لحذفه هذا الرد
    جعلها الله في ميزان حسناته وجزاه عنا كل الخير

    تعليق

    • منيره الفهري
      مدير عام. رئيس ملتقى الترجمة
      • 21-12-2010
      • 9870

      #3
      مهم جدا و ثري ما تفضلت بنشره أستاذ محمد مصطفى

      و نحن بدورنا نقول لك جزاك الله عنا كل خير على مثل هذا المقال القيم سيدي الفاضل

      تعليق

      • رجاء نويصري
        عضو الملتقى
        • 04-01-2012
        • 41

        #4
        أستاذنا الرائع محمد مصطفى هذا المقال إن دلّ على شئ فإنما يدلّ على المجهود الجبار الذي قمت به فلك كل الشكر والتقدير

        تعليق

        يعمل...
        X